By Haley R. Moore
A new study published by Daniel Pratson, Natural Resources Extension Specialist for University of Maryland Extension, highlighted how the maple syrup industry could integrate high levels of forestry management without increasing production costs.
The research centered on private forestland used for maple syrup production in Vermont. The study highlights results from a survey that asked producers about their expenses tied to forest management, and results revealed that forests can be managed to support biodiversity and ecological health without imposing a financial burden on the landowners.
“Producers demonstrated that they can manage their forests in a way that is a little bit more beneficial to biodiversity without coming at a huge cost,” said Pratson. “It’s a win-win.”
Having a biodiverse forest supports wildlife habitats, enhances carbon sequestration, and fosters ecosystem resiliency.
“I think a lot of this comes down to idea of stewardship and the fact that we do not own these properties forever,” said Pratson. “We are making sure they are well taken care of while we are in charge and then it is up to the next person to do the same.”
While the maple syrup industry is vast in New England and Canada, the findings could inform producers in Maryland.
Maple syrup production exists on a much smaller scale, particularly focused in the western part of the state. Though the region is not a major commercial player, the commodity acts as an additional stream of revenue for producers and provides opportunities for them to adopt beneficial forest management practices.
“People think of maple syrup when they think of Vermont. They might not think of Maryland,” said Pratson. “But I do think the study is relevant to our state’s producers. Enough people are interested in syrup production as a component of their forest management that the takeaway from the study is applicable in our forests here, too.”
The study also explored how third-party conservation programs influenced management practices. For example, the term “bird-friendly,” an initiative promoted by the National Audubon Society, encourages producers to commit to practices that support bird habitats and biodiversity.
Though the study did not directly determine if these third-party groups affected the outcome of forestry management, it suggests that recognition-based initiatives may help reinforce conservation practices valued by some producers.
Pratson suggested that outreach, peer networks, and educational programs could help maple syrup producers adopt biodiverse forestry management practices in these regions.